Corporate Gibberish & more.

Have you ever felt the need to read & employ corporate gibberish?

Well, we did. And here are the results. We, at On Time RMS, are in love with the Corporate Gibberish Generator at Andrew-Davidson-dot-com :)

Have you ever needed to incentivize your feature set? In one step? What does the term “structuring” really mean? Quick: do you have a global plan for managing new B2B2C, sexy CAE supervising? We think that most cross-media web sites use far too much CSS, and not enough SVG. We think that most vertical web-based applications use far too much PNG, and not enough C++. We believe we know that if you seize wirelessly then you may also transform perfectly. Quick: do you have a efficient strategy for managing new ROI metrics? The power to actualize wirelessly leads to the power to iterate virally. Is it more important for something to be robust or to be transparent? We understand that if you strategize holistically then you may also optimize super-cyber-mega-nano-proactively. Without well-planned infrastructures, super-nano-leading-edge reporting are forced to become long-term. We believe we know that if you deploy efficiently then you may also leverage transparently. Imagine a combination of XMLHttpRequest and XForms.

On Time RMS practically invented the term “24/7 relationships”. Do you have a plan of action to become subscriber-defined? Think social-network-based. Think customized. Think next-generation. But don’t think all three at the same time. What does it really mean to actualize “holistically”? Imagine a combination of PGP and XForms. If you orchestrate super-dynamically, you may have to incubate vertically. Think fractal. Think mission-critical. Think customer-defined. But don’t think all three at the same time. A company that can cultivate defiantly will (at some indefinite point of time in the future) be able to orchestrate defiantly. We think that most B2B2C portals use far too much PHP, and not enough HTML. The aptitude to unleash mega-vertically leads to the ability to generate dynamically. Do you have a plan to become 60/60/24/7/365? Our technology takes the best features of SMIL and Java. We understand that it is better to matrix dynamically than to morph cyber-efficiently.

We here at On Time RMS understand that it is better to visualize iteravely than to maximize vertically. Without well-planned angel investors, e-businesses are forced to become cross-platform. We understand that it is better to maximize intuitively than to e-enable holistically. We think that most strategic web sites use far too much WAP, and not enough Python. What does the jargon-based jargon-based term “cross-media” really mean? We will augment our aptitude to incubate without devaluing our ability to morph. The versioning factor can be summed up in one word: enterprise. We usually streamline wireless sexy, cross-platform structuring. That is a terrific achievement taking into account this year’s conditions! If all of this may seem incredible to you, that’s because it is! What does the term “experiences” really mean?

Have you ever been unable to cultivate your feature set? Without having to learn J2EE? If you envisioneer virally, you may have to morph interactively. If all of this sounds wonderful to you, that’s because it is! Quick: do you have a integrated scheme for managing new web-readiness? If you seize interactively, you may have to engineer nano-efficiently. We believe we know that it is better to implement wirelessly than to enable strategically. The networks factor can be summed up in one word: 60/24/7/365. A company that can upgrade defiantly will (at some indefinite point in the future) be able to deploy fiercely. If all of this may seem astounding to you, that’s because it is! What does it really mean to engage “compellingly”? Think micro-web-enabled, C2B2B.

We here at On Time RMS have come to know that it is better to upgrade virally than to syndicate dynamically. Do you have a scheme to become synergistic? What does it really mean to utilize “cyber-seamlessly”? If all of this may seem marvelous to you, that’s because it is! Do you have a scheme to become cross-platform? We understand that it is better to facilitate intra-intuitively than to leverage transparently. Is it more important for something to be user-centric or to be value-added? Do you have a game plan to become visionary? What does it really mean to innovate “transparently”? Do you have a plan of action to become value-added? We think that most cutting-edge web portals use far too much Ruby on Rails, and not enough Dynamic HTML. If you implement transparently, you may have to enable globally. Think cutting-edge.

At On Time RMS, we have proven we know how to e-enable ultra-dynamically. We pride ourselves not only on our client-focused feature set, but our simple administration and newbie-proof configuration. Is it more important for something to be seamless or to be best-of-breed? We realize that if you deploy seamlessly then you may also disintermediate virally. Your budget for reintermediating should be at least one-tenth of your budget for recontextualizing. We will brand the term “cross-media”. What does the term “process management” really mean? Think B2B2C. Think customer-defined. Think leading-edge. But don’t think all three at the same time. We think we know that it is better to syndicate nano-vertically than to grow globally. Think visionary. If you transform transparently, you may have to streamline virally. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and user-proof use.

On Time RMS is the industry leader of cross-platform raw bandwidth metrics. Think intra-customer-directed. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our non-complex administration and user-proof operation. Our technology takes the best features of JavaScript and OWL. We will revalue our power to syndicate without depreciating our power to streamline. We apply the proverb “A watched pot never boils” not only to our paradigms but our aptitude to architect. We understand that if you orchestrate virally then you may also scale transparently. Is it more important for something to be best-of-breed or to be infinitely reconfigurable? The compliance factor is short-term. Your budget for synergizing should be at least one-half of your budget for revolutionizing. We think that most virtual web sites use far too much ActionScript, and not enough SMIL. If you implement robustly, you may have to expedite interactively.

At On Time RMS, we have proven we know how to expedite globally. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our simple administration and user-proof use. A company that can optimize correctly will (at some undefined point in the future) be able to optimize faithfully. Think intra-reality-based. The iteration factor is subscriber-defined. We understand that it is better to generate holistically than to synthesize super-compellingly. We will aggregate the term “1000/60/60/24/7/365”. The metrics for content are more well-understood if they are not intuitive. We pride ourselves not only on our functionality, but our easy administration and user-proof configuration. We will add to our power to benchmark without decrementing our capacity to synergize. We pride ourselves not only on our feature set, but our easy administration and non-complex operation. The capacity to deploy seamlessly leads to the capacity to recontextualize virtually. Think ultra-bleeding-edge.

At On Time RMS, we realize how to facilitate transparently. Do you have a plan of action to become distributed? What does the jargon-based term “e-markets” really mean? The aptitude to synergize intuitively leads to the capacity to orchestrate seamlessly. We think that most open-source portals use far too much PNG, and not enough PHP. It sounds terrific, but it’s accurate! It may seem marvelous, but it’s entirely realistic! Think customer-directed. If all of this may seem terrific to you, that’s because it is! If all of this comes off as confusing to you, that’s because it is! The metrics for synergies are more well-understood if they are not enterprise.

courtesy:

http://www.andrewdavidson.com/gibberish/

cheers


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

show
 
close
Follow on Twitter facebook linkedin google+